A different approach to bracing

What're You Doing?
Tony_in_NYC
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:11 pm

Re: A different approach to bracing

Post by Tony_in_NYC »

I just want to point out that this is not a guitar Ray is building. He posted the picture of a top he saw elsewhere. Either that, or Ray is building guitars with arm bevels and waist bevels and is holding out on sharing his experience on how to do so.
Seriously, this is not Ray's top. It was posted to start a discussion and to jump start our thoughts on top bracing. It worked.
rgogo65

Re: A different approach to bracing

Post by rgogo65 »

Tony_in_NYC wrote:I just want to point out that this is not a guitar Ray is building. He posted the picture of a top he saw elsewhere. Either that, or Ray is building guitars with arm bevels and waist bevels and is holding out on sharing his experience on how to do so.
Seriously, this is not Ray's top. It was posted to start a discussion and to jump start our thoughts on top bracing. It worked.
You are so right Tony, I'm still at the "Popsicle stick" level of building...thanks for the clarification (:0)>}
tippie53
Posts: 7141
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:09 pm
Location: Hegins, Pa
Contact:

Re: A different approach to bracing

Post by tippie53 »

Points don't break off on braces unless you do something to them. The wood should be quartered so the grain would be in a position to support the point .Bracing shape is a key to controlling the stiffness and mass of a top . I agree these braces are not to my style as I am a martin traditionalist .
John Hall
Blues Creek Guitars Inc
Authorized CF Martin Repair Center
president of Association of Stringed Instrument Artisans
http://www.bluescreekguitars.com
Post Reply