Top first or back first?
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:44 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Top first or back first?
I can't see why that wouldn't work Dave. Good suggestion.
Slacker......
Re: Top first or back first?
It has the advantage of being easy to try :-)
Re: Top first or back first?
Just as an aside, Tom Ribekke (sp?) thought it so important to be able to tweak the braces after the guitar was assembled that he invented and patented the tail block access panel --- which Charles Fox just happens to offer as an option on his $10,000 guitars. (Or are they more expensive now?)
So I think the advantage is real, but of course knowing what you are listening for in order to make intelligent adjustments is something that takes a lot of work.
So I think the advantage is real, but of course knowing what you are listening for in order to make intelligent adjustments is something that takes a lot of work.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:44 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Top first or back first?
Trevor Gore sheds a lot of light on this very topic though it's based more on measurements than listening. Valuable information shared in his books (to me).deadedith wrote: So I think the advantage is real, but of course knowing what you are listening for in order to make intelligent adjustments is something that takes a lot of work.
Last edited by Darryl Young on Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slacker......
-
- Posts: 1405
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:14 pm
- Location: Creedmoor, NC
Re: Top first or back first?
And here in lies the key. I can't say with certainty I do. I only know every guitar I've made has gotten rave kudos from those who have played them and I don't think any have sounded exactly the same. To me a good sounding guitar is just that, a good sounding guitar albeit different than than the way many others sound. So I'm not going to worry about it much.deadedith wrote:but of course knowing what you are listening for in order to make intelligent adjustments is something that takes a lot of work.
Tim Benware
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:44 pm
- Location: Arkansas
Re: Top first or back first?
Man! If I could honestly say that, I would not change my methods either! I'm not there yet, though.Ben-Had wrote: I only know every guitar I've made has gotten rave kudos
Cleaning up a little glue has not been a big enough deal for me to change to a back-first glue sequence; more challenging has been recognizing the individual quirks of each instrument and learning to control them as the build , and any method that gives me the opportunity to exert that control is a plus as far as I'm concerned.
Of course that is my 'point of view' and there is a world of other points-of-view and that makes the world go 'round. That, and supply-side economics. :-)
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:30 pm
- Location: N. Salem, NY
Re: Top first or back first?
FYI, Wayne Henderson glues the back on first. See the book: Clapton's Guitar.
Re: Top first or back first?
Yep, I knew that. He also uses woods that I cannot even afford, which may have more effect on sound than glue clean up. :-)
The downside to top-first is - what?? A little glue clean up? Really? And that outweighs the fact that it gives much more access for final adjustments and tweaks that are impossible with the back-first?
I don't get it. But really folks, I'm not trying to do anything except share information, and not 'ex cathedra', just in the spirit of we're all in this together.
I try to check my ego in at the door. :-)
The downside to top-first is - what?? A little glue clean up? Really? And that outweighs the fact that it gives much more access for final adjustments and tweaks that are impossible with the back-first?
I don't get it. But really folks, I'm not trying to do anything except share information, and not 'ex cathedra', just in the spirit of we're all in this together.
I try to check my ego in at the door. :-)