Of Truss Rods and Old Books
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 3:22 pm
My brother and I are contemplating the neck and fretboard on our first builds. We referred to Cumpiano, as usual, and realize that the use of dual action truss rods may render some of this information obsolete. Can any of you experienced builders confirm this?
Just before Cumpiano (the Big C, Coompie, you know) begins to radius his fretboard (page 283 of my copy) he tightens the truss rod to create a slight hump of 1/32-1/64" and then re-flattens the fingerboard. This step ensures that the neck will be under a slight truss tension when it is flat, so he can loosen a bit if he needs to create a forward bow. We think that this step is superfluous (extra points for using this word!) if we use a hotrod. Do you concur? Or is there a reason for this step that we haven't thought of?
Please send opinions before my brothers head explodes or turns inside out from overthink.
Just before Cumpiano (the Big C, Coompie, you know) begins to radius his fretboard (page 283 of my copy) he tightens the truss rod to create a slight hump of 1/32-1/64" and then re-flattens the fingerboard. This step ensures that the neck will be under a slight truss tension when it is flat, so he can loosen a bit if he needs to create a forward bow. We think that this step is superfluous (extra points for using this word!) if we use a hotrod. Do you concur? Or is there a reason for this step that we haven't thought of?
Please send opinions before my brothers head explodes or turns inside out from overthink.