finishing an electric guitar
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2025 4:36 pm
Here's a question I have about finishing the Stew-Mac electric guitar kit I got for Christmas).
I usually finish my acoustic guitars with a rattle-can nitrocellulose (Mohawk Instrument Lacquer from Woodcraft), and I've used Tru-Oil for that purpose once with good results. This is because it results in a thin, hard finish that doesn't interfere with the wood's resonant qualities. (All my necks are finished with Tru-Oil, and I intend to use that on the neck of my new guitar as well.)
But for the body, I'm thinking of using just a wipe-on polyurethane after filling the pores of the mahogany. The reasoning is that except for possible esthetic reasons, the finish on a solid guitar body doesn't affect the acoustic properties, or so I've been told by other guitarists. Unlike an acoustic guitar body's ability to resonate and affect the tone, the only variation on a solid wood body that matters is its weight, the theory being that the greater mass minimizes the effect of a string's vibration being dissipated through the bridge, thereby increasing the "sustain" of the string. On an acoustic guitar, you want that vibration to go through the bridge into the top of the guitar, because it's the top that transmit the vibration into the air. But there is no soundboard on a solid-body, hence no effect of that guitar's finish on the production of sound.
But I may be overthinking this, as I am wont to do. Is this reasoning sound? Should I go on with the wipe-on poly, or should I get out the rattle-cans again and use them on the body?
I usually finish my acoustic guitars with a rattle-can nitrocellulose (Mohawk Instrument Lacquer from Woodcraft), and I've used Tru-Oil for that purpose once with good results. This is because it results in a thin, hard finish that doesn't interfere with the wood's resonant qualities. (All my necks are finished with Tru-Oil, and I intend to use that on the neck of my new guitar as well.)
But for the body, I'm thinking of using just a wipe-on polyurethane after filling the pores of the mahogany. The reasoning is that except for possible esthetic reasons, the finish on a solid guitar body doesn't affect the acoustic properties, or so I've been told by other guitarists. Unlike an acoustic guitar body's ability to resonate and affect the tone, the only variation on a solid wood body that matters is its weight, the theory being that the greater mass minimizes the effect of a string's vibration being dissipated through the bridge, thereby increasing the "sustain" of the string. On an acoustic guitar, you want that vibration to go through the bridge into the top of the guitar, because it's the top that transmit the vibration into the air. But there is no soundboard on a solid-body, hence no effect of that guitar's finish on the production of sound.
But I may be overthinking this, as I am wont to do. Is this reasoning sound? Should I go on with the wipe-on poly, or should I get out the rattle-cans again and use them on the body?