Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Take us through building your guitar step by step. Post pictures and tell us what you're doing.
Post Reply
carld05
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:19 pm
Location: Forest Ranch, CA

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by carld05 »

I usually don't cut out the soundhole until after the rosette is set and sanded. That way the hole for the router pin is still there for possible fixes.
MaineGeezer
Posts: 1715
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 12:14 pm

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by MaineGeezer »

Yeah -- replacing the center point can be difficult. I've never had to do it, of course....
Don't believe everything you know.
Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
When things are bad, try not to make them any worse, because it is quite likely they are bad enough already. - French Foreign Legion
nkwak
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:55 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA suburbs

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by nkwak »

Yes, I regret routing the sound hole but as you can see in the picture the top is still aligned with the mounting hole for the circle cutter.
~ Neil
Stray Feathers
Posts: 685
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 11:39 pm
Location: Ladysmith, BC

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by Stray Feathers »

It's possible to use your circle cutter to cut a plug just the right size to sit in the soundhole, so you have a better base for recutting your rings. I know this because I too have had to redo rosette rings, and as Carl says, I've learned to cut the soundhole when I was sure I was happy with the rosette. The smallest cracks can look like the Grand Canyon down the road. It's a challenge to realign the circle cutter perfectly and you may have to rout your ring a touch oversize and add a strip or two of purfling, maybe a single black strip to the inside and/or outside edges. Bruce W.
nkwak
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:55 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA suburbs

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by nkwak »

Is it really necessary to cut out a plug if I use the work board's pilot hole and can align the top using the jig at the same circumference as the sound hole?
~ Neil
phavriluk
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by phavriluk »

It doesn't take long to make a plug and proceed. It does take a long time to right a problem that using the plug avoids. Best way to get something done? Do it right.
peter havriluk
carld05
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:19 pm
Location: Forest Ranch, CA

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by carld05 »

I'd recommend it. I'd think even a couple of thousandths off center might visually be discernible .... or not. :,)
Edit: Had another thought. Cut the plug from matching hardwood, fit tight, glue it in, then cut your soundhole slightly smaller the second time for a bound soundhole. I try to make a feature out of my many mistakes.
nkwak
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:55 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA suburbs

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by nkwak »

Here's how the second attempt turned out. I am okay with it. This is not for sale after all.

Image

BTW, my local shop has some Martin 000s in stock, including a 000-18 Modern Deluxe and several 000-28 1937 spec custom shop in both natural and Stage 1 Ambertone finish - which inexplicably includes finish checking. I went in basically to see how the 24.9" scale felt and since this one will also have the same neck and scale length I have to say I am more excited than ever to see how this one turns out.
~ Neil
nkwak
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:55 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA suburbs

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by nkwak »

I glued the X brace in the other day.

Image
Last edited by nkwak on Tue May 16, 2023 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~ Neil
Kevin Sjostrand
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:06 pm
Location: Visalia, CA

Re: Build #3: sitka/black walnut 000

Post by Kevin Sjostrand »

Neil
I'd say that looks just great. You did a good job
Post Reply