New to group
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:49 pm
Hello all,
I’m new to this group. With some trepidation, I’m in the initial planning stages for my first kit guitar project. I’ve learned a few of the basics from a couple of books, on the web, and by just playing around with the LMI kit wizard, but I have not yet settled on either a particular guitar type or a supplier.
I’ll probably go with a Martin OM style. I am intrigued, though, by the 12-fret neck on the standard “14-fret body” design that has recently gained interest. I just noticed that Taylor has a GC model of that same basic design among their specialty guitars. This general design seems to suit my playing, which is almost exclusively finger style and rarely up to the 12th fret.
My question for the group is whether there is any reason why a first time builder should avoid this non-standard design. LMI lists a pre-carved, bolt-on, 12-fret neck that could, it would seem, be mated to the OM “14-fret” body. It’s expensive, but I think it is best for me to use a pre-carved neck and other “serviced” items for this first project, regardless of design.
I realize that the bridge is pushed further from the sound hole than usual in this design, but that, in itself, does not appear to pose any special building difficulty. Are there other issues that would make this type of design ill-advised for a first timer? For example, is the standard 14-fret body bracing pattern still appropriate with the bridge pushed further back from the sound hole than usual? Are there any other issues that would complicate construction?
Thank you!
Tim R
I’m new to this group. With some trepidation, I’m in the initial planning stages for my first kit guitar project. I’ve learned a few of the basics from a couple of books, on the web, and by just playing around with the LMI kit wizard, but I have not yet settled on either a particular guitar type or a supplier.
I’ll probably go with a Martin OM style. I am intrigued, though, by the 12-fret neck on the standard “14-fret body” design that has recently gained interest. I just noticed that Taylor has a GC model of that same basic design among their specialty guitars. This general design seems to suit my playing, which is almost exclusively finger style and rarely up to the 12th fret.
My question for the group is whether there is any reason why a first time builder should avoid this non-standard design. LMI lists a pre-carved, bolt-on, 12-fret neck that could, it would seem, be mated to the OM “14-fret” body. It’s expensive, but I think it is best for me to use a pre-carved neck and other “serviced” items for this first project, regardless of design.
I realize that the bridge is pushed further from the sound hole than usual in this design, but that, in itself, does not appear to pose any special building difficulty. Are there other issues that would make this type of design ill-advised for a first timer? For example, is the standard 14-fret body bracing pattern still appropriate with the bridge pushed further back from the sound hole than usual? Are there any other issues that would complicate construction?
Thank you!
Tim R