Consequences of a larger soundhole?
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 2:19 am
Re: Consequences of a larger soundhole?
I sure will :)
-
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 8:03 am
- Location: Chestertown Maryland
Re: Consequences of a larger soundhole?
I built a pre-1929 maple/sitka Gibson L-00 with 14 frets and a conventional 3-3/4"soundhole. A couple of instruments later I built another, this one a Nick Lucas Special copy, 12 fret mahogany/sitka. It's body is an extra 3/4" deeper and the soundhole was 3-5/16" if I recall - I don't have it any longer. I could still get my (smallish) hand into it just fine.
When compared to the maple one, the mahogany is not as bright, but the volume is similar - both pretty good.
I have played that Nick alongside a Circle Strings copy of a Nick, also mahogany and 13 frets, with a larger soundhole. The balance was close to the same, but the volume was more subdued. Note the Circle Strings (bottom picture) appears to have a bigger soundhole than the maple one. It was pretty loud.
Ed
When compared to the maple one, the mahogany is not as bright, but the volume is similar - both pretty good.
I have played that Nick alongside a Circle Strings copy of a Nick, also mahogany and 13 frets, with a larger soundhole. The balance was close to the same, but the volume was more subdued. Note the Circle Strings (bottom picture) appears to have a bigger soundhole than the maple one. It was pretty loud.
Ed
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ed M
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 2:19 am
Re: Consequences of a larger soundhole?
It will be exiting to hear what impact it has on the sound, that's for sure! :)