Neck and tail blocks

What're You Doing?
Post Reply
Ben-Had
Posts: 1405
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:14 pm
Location: Creedmoor, NC

Neck and tail blocks

Post by Ben-Had »

Do y'all radius these blocks?
Tim Benware
seanbig
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Neck and tail blocks

Post by seanbig »

Ben,

Yes; when radiusing the sides with a concave luthier disk (driving the bus in BCS), the neck and tail blocks get that same radius. Then your top and back sit nicely into your sides and the neck and tail blocks will be good gluing surfaces and will mate nicely.

BCS - Blues Creek Speak
Sean Big
Sean@BiggerRoom.net
Bigger Room Productions - Web Design for any size project.

When You're Workin' on Somethin' Good
You're Gonna Need a Bigger Room
David L
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:04 pm
Location: Slidell, La

Re: Neck and tail blocks

Post by David L »

Ben-Had wrote:Do y'all radius these blocks?
seanbig wrote:Ben,

Yes; when radiusing the sides with a concave luthier disk (driving the bus in BCS), the neck and tail blocks get that same radius. Then your top and back sit nicely into your sides and the neck and tail blocks will be good gluing surfaces and will mate nicely.

BCS - Blues Creek Speak
Or are you asking about radiusing the sides of the blocks that get glued to the sides themselves?

David L
kencierp

Re: Neck and tail blocks

Post by kencierp »

The long side of the tail block can have gentle radius (OM/D etc) or a pronounced radius like the J185, J200, Martin performer series etc. The top side edge is flat, the back side edge is radiused to 15' or 20'. Some tail blocks have an angle shaved on the inside edges so the net thickness on the ends is the same as the width of the kerfing -- I do like this method.

The neck block has a slight radius on the edges, the surface under the neck heel is left flat -- this slight taper allows for a nice smooth transition so the sides do not have a sharp bend coming around the upper bout curve. The back edge is radiused at 15' or 20' The top surface of the neck block is sanded flat at a 1.3 degree angle.
Ken Hundley
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:34 am
Location: Wilmette, IL

Re: Neck and tail blocks

Post by Ken Hundley »

I radius the tail block where the sides meet....fits into my mold just right. The top and bottom get radiused as I sand the edges of the rim to fit the top and back plates. I like to radius the inside corners..I think it looks good, and I do not like right angles (corners, so to speak) in a transition on the inside of a plate....stress riser to my way of thinking. Radiusing my corners spreads the joint stress there. Something from my ultrasonics days.
PB020002.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ken Hundley
Nocturnal Guitars
http://www.nocturnalguitars.com

So, my big brother was playing guitar and I figured I'd try it too.
- Stevie Ray Vaughan
tippie53
Posts: 7019
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:09 pm
Location: Hegins, Pa
Contact:

Re: Neck and tail blocks

Post by tippie53 »

yes radius them to match your mold.
John Hall
Blues Creek Guitars Inc
Authorized CF Martin Repair Center
president of Association of Stringed Instrument Artisans
http://www.bluescreekguitars.com
Ben-Had
Posts: 1405
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:14 pm
Location: Creedmoor, NC

Re: Neck and tail blocks

Post by Ben-Had »

David L wrote:
Ben-Had wrote:Do y'all radius these blocks?
seanbig wrote:Ben,

Yes; when radiusing the sides with a concave luthier disk (driving the bus in BCS), the neck and tail blocks get that same radius. Then your top and back sit nicely into your sides and the neck and tail blocks will be good gluing surfaces and will mate nicely.

BCS - Blues Creek Speak
Or are you asking about radiusing the sides of the blocks that get glued to the sides themselves?

David L
Boy was that an open ended question but yes, that's the spot I was talking about and John H gave me the answer I was looking for. However, there were a lot of other good things to think about. Thanks for the responses everyone.
Tim Benware
Post Reply